Calcutta HC Directs Anti-Fraud & GST Dept To Conduct ‘Assessee-Centric’ Investigations & Avoid Generalized Public Notices
The Calcutta High Court has recently clarified the scope of a previous direction given by a Single Bench and emphasized the need for focused and individualized investigations in cases of revenue fraud.
The case revolved around a directive issued by the Single Bench of the Calcutta High Court to the police authorities, instructing them to investigate the extent of fake writ petitions filed in the past, that resulted in revenue loss and defrauded the government.
The Division bench comprising of Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya first addressed the maintainability of the appeal and concluded that it was indeed maintainable, based on the fact that soon after the impugned order was passed by the Single Bench, the Anti-Fraud Department of the Kolkata Police and the GST Department issued notices to the advocates who regularly appeared for clients in cases related to Goods and Services Tax, West Bengal Value Added Tax, West Bengal Sales Tax and other related enactments.
However, when this matter was brought to the attention of the court, it was advised that the authorities had no jurisdiction to issue notices to the advocates seeking information about their clients, as, such information was privileged communication between clients and their advocates, added the Bench.
Advocate Vinay Kr. Shraff appeared for the Appellant, whereas Md. T.M. Siddiqui appeared for the Respondent.
Referring to Section 126 of the Evidence Act which prohibits attorneys from disclosing attorney-client communication without the express consent of the client concerned, the Bench noted that after receiving proper advice from the State counsel, the notices sent to the advocates were withdrawn by emails dated June 05, 2023.
Next, the High Court observed that the police authorities were directed to investigate the filing of fake cases, but the Anti-Fraud Department misunderstood the scope of the direction and issued notices under Section 160 CrPC to the directors of various assesses without disclosing any details.
The High Court clarified that investigations should be assessee-centric and therefore, issuing generalized public notices, should be avoided.
Thus, the Bench set aside the notices issued under Section 160 CrPC in a standardized form and directed both Revenue authorities and police to conduct a thorough study of the documents available with the GST Department and then proceed with a proper investigation that was as per the law.
The approach of considering all assesses throughout the State of West Bengal as fraudsters, was not as per the law, emphasized the Bench.
Lastly, the Bench concluded that the GST authorities should conduct a thorough study and investigation to determine whether there had been any illegal availment of GST, and if they find any violations, then they can initiate proceedings under the provisions of the GST Act.
However, if the authorities suspect the involvement of a criminal overt act, they should hand over the matter to the appropriate investigation authority to proceed as per the law, cautioned the Bench.
Cause Title: Himangshu Kumar Ray v. State of West Bengal
Click here to read/download the Order
